2003 PLP 2323(1) (YLR)
MUHAMMAD RIAZ — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2003 PLP 2323(1) (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Khawaja Muhammad Sharif, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD RIAZ — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2003 PLP 2323(1) (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2003 PLP 2323(1) (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Khawaja Muhammad Sharif, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2003 PLP 2323(1) (YLR) (MUHAMMAD RIAZ — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Malik Muhammad Azam Awan for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.324/337-A(ii)/337-L(ii)l34
Accused who was armed with hatchet, had given two blows on the head of injured which was a most vital part of the body-- Provisions of S. 324, P.P.C. being fully attracted in the case, offence against the accused fell within ambit of S..497(1), Cr. P. C.
In absence of any ground for grant of bail to the accused, his bail application was dismissed. Malik Muhammad Imtiaz Mahl for the Complainant.
Judgment & Decree
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.324/337-A(ii)/337-L(ii)l34
Accused who was armed with hatchet, had given two blows on the head of injured which was a most vital part of the body-- Provisions of S. 324, P.P.C. being fully attracted in the case, offence against the accused fell within ambit of S..497(1), Cr. P. C.
In absence of any ground for grant of bail to the accused, his bail application was dismissed. Malik Muhammad Azam Awan for Petitioner. Malik Muhammad Imtiaz Mahl for the Complainant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that offence alleged against the petitioner does not fall within the ambit of section 497(1), Cr.P.C. that according to the F.I.R. petitioner was armed with hatchet but "Sota" was recovered from him, that he has been falsely implicated, that he is behind the bars for the last three months and that challan has not been submitted before the trial Court.
2. On the other hand, learned counsel for the complainant submits that merciless beating was given to the injured and petitioner is not entitled for the grant of bail.
3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. In the instant case, petitioner was armed with hatchet, he gave two injuries on the head of injured which is a most vital part of the body, section 324, P.P.C. is fully attracted in this case, offence falls within the ambit of section 497(1), Cr.P.C. No ground for bail is made out. Dismissed. H. B. T./M-1768/L Bail application dismissed.