2006 PLP 1394 (YLR)
GHULAM RASOOL — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2006 PLP 1394 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Soomro and Faisal Arab, JJ |
| Parties | GHULAM RASOOL — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 PLP 1394 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 PLP 1394 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Soomro and Faisal Arab, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 PLP 1394 (YLR) (GHULAM RASOOL — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), S.9(c)
According to Chemical Examiner's report total weight of parcel of Chars was 385 grams and net weight was 375 grams
Total weight of recovered Chars, in circumstances was less than one Kilogram subject to final proof at the trial
Case being of two versions, accused was entitled to be enlarged on bail. Muhammad Ayaz Soomro for Applicant. Mushtaque Ahmed Abbasi Asstt.A.-G. for the State.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMD AFZAL SOOMRO, J.
The case of the prosecution is that 1100 grams of Charas were recovered from the possession of the applicant, out of which only 500 grams were sent for chemical examination and the remaining 600 grams were sealed separately. Counsel for the applicant has referred the Chemical Examiner's report, wherein the total weight of the parcel has been shown as 385 grams and the net weight of the Charas sent to the Chemical Examiner has been shown as 375 grams. The learned Asstt.A.-G., is not in a position to rebut the contention that the total weight of the recovered Charas appears to be less than one kilogram subject to the final proof at the trial. It is a case of two versions and, therefore, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In this situation, the application is allowed and the applicant is granted bail subject to his furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.100,000 and P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. H.B.T./G-11/K Bail granted.