1995 PLP 1061 (SCMR)
Mst. ZAINAB BIBI and 8 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus ABDUL MALIK and 12 others‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1995 PLP 1061 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Saiduzzaman Siddiqui and Mukhtar Ahmed Junejo, JJ |
| Parties | Mst. ZAINAB BIBI and 8 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus ABDUL MALIK and 12 others‑‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1995 PLP 1061 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1995 PLP 1061 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Saiduzzaman Siddiqui and Mukhtar Ahmed Junejo, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1995 PLP 1061 (SCMR) (Mst. ZAINAB BIBI and 8 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus ABDUL MALIK and 12 others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Hafiz SA. Rehman, Advocate Supreme Court with Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 29th November, 1994.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment of Peshawar High Court dated 26‑2‑1994 (Abbotabad Bench) passed in CR 101/90). ‑‑‑‑S. 115(1), 2nd proviso [as added by Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act (VI of 1992)]‑‑‑Leave to appeal was granted to consider whether Civil Revision filed by petitioners under S. 115, C.P.C. in September, 1990, could be dismissed by High Court on the ground that same was filed beyond the period of 90 days prescribed under second proviso to S. 115(1), C.P.C. which was added by Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1992' promulgated on 30‑5‑1992.
Judgment & Decree
(On appeal from the judgment of Peshawar High Court dated 26‑2‑1994 (Abbotabad Bench) passed in CR 101/90). ‑‑‑‑S. 115(1), 2nd proviso [as added by Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act (VI of 1992)]‑‑‑Leave to appeal was granted to consider whether Civil Revision filed by petitioners under S. 115, C.P.C. in September, 1990, could be dismissed by High Court on the ground that same was filed beyond the period of 90 days prescribed under second proviso to S. 115(1), C.P.C. which was added by Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1992' promulgated on 30‑5‑1992. Hafiz SA. Rehman, Advocate Supreme Court with Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing: 29th November, 1994. SAIDUZZAMAN SIDDIQUI, J.‑‑‑Leave is granted in the case to consider whether the Civil Revision Application filed by the petitioners under section 115, C.P:C. in September 1990, could be dismissed by the High. Court on the ground that it was filed beyond the period of 90 days prescribed under the 2nd proviso to subsection (1) of section 115, C.P.C. which was added in the Code of Civil Procedure by Act No. VI of 1992 promulgated on 30‑5‑1992. A.A./Z‑186/S Leave granted.