2004 P Cr (PLP)
MADAD KHAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents
| Citation | 2004 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Peshawar |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MADAD KHAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2004 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2004 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Peshawar bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2004 P Cr (PLP) (MADAD KHAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Abdul Latif Afridi for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302/324
Bail, grant of-- Accused was charged in F.I.R. for effective firing and causing injuries on the private /delicate parts of body of the deceased
Prima facie, evidence connected the accused with commission of said offence-- Multiple injuries were found on the body of deceased and medical evidence had lent full support to the prosecution case
Accused remained absconder for sufficient long time and due to said abscondence, accused had lost some of the normal rights granted by the procedural as well as substantive law for bail
Abscondence of accused was unexplained
Challan of the case had been submitted in the Court and the trial was likely to conclude in the near future
Bail application of accused was dismissed, in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Bail Application No. 1066 of 2003, heard on 3rd November, 2003.
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302/324
Bail, grant of-- Accused was charged in F.I.R. for effective firing and causing injuries on the private /delicate parts of body of the deceased
Prima facie, evidence connected the accused with commission of said offence-- Multiple injuries were found on the body of deceased and medical evidence had lent full support to the prosecution case
Accused remained absconder for sufficient long time and due to said abscondence, accused had lost some of the normal rights granted by the procedural as well as substantive law for bail
Abscondence of accused was unexplained
Challan of the case had been submitted in the Court and the trial was likely to conclude in the near future
Bail application of accused was dismissed, in circumstances. Muhammad Akram v. The State PLD 1993 Pesh. 175; Sher Ali alias Sheri v. The State 1998 SCMR 190 and Khial Gul and another v. The State and another 2002 PCr.LJ 1054 ref. Abdul Latif Afridi for Petitioner. Shah Nawaz Khan Chamkani for the State. Asadullah for the Complainant. Date of hearing; 3rd November, 2003.