1988 P Cr (PLP)
KHADIM HUSSAIN‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1988 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Afrasiab Khan, J |
| Parties | KHADIM HUSSAIN‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1988 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1988 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Afrasiab Khan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1988 P Cr (PLP) (KHADIM HUSSAIN‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Muhammad Taqi Khan for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Criminal Procedure. Code (V of 1898)‑‑ ‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302/34‑‑Bail, grant of --Accused found empty handed at time of occurrence‑‑First information report lodged with delay‑‑Bail granted. S.M. Hamid for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Procedure. Code (V of 1898)‑‑ ‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302/34‑‑Bail, grant of --Accused found empty handed at time of occurrence‑‑First information report lodged with delay‑‑Bail granted. Muhammad Taqi Khan for Petitioner. S.M. Hamid for the State. The petitioner Khadim Hussain has moved this after arrest bail petition under section 498, Cr.P.C. in a case registered against him under section 302/34, P.P.C. at Police Station Shahkot vide F.I.R No.167 dated 3‑9‑1987.
2. Learned counsel argued that the petitioner was empty handed at the time of occurrence. He next forcefully submitted that there was absolutely no motive with the petitioner to commit the offence Learned State counsel opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner half‑heartedly. He could not say anything substantial against the petitioner. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have perused the record very carefully. The petitioner was found empty handed. There is definitely delay in lodging the F I.R Learned State counsel was unable to dislodge the weighty argument of learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is admitted to bail in the sum of Rs.50,000 with two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of A.C. Sheikhupura. This petition stands disposed of. M.Y.H./K‑66/ L Bail granted.