1992 P Cr (PLP)
M. SAEED SHAD‑‑‑petitioner Versus S.H.O.‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1992 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Raja Afrasiab Khan, J |
| Parties | M. SAEED SHAD‑‑‑petitioner Versus S.H.O.‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Raja Afrasiab Khan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 P Cr (PLP) (M. SAEED SHAD‑‑‑petitioner Versus S.H.O.‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Kh. Muhammad Sharif‑for Petitioner.
- Maqbool Elahi Malik, A.‑G. (Punjab) for Respondent..
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S. 491‑‑‑Habeas corpus
‑‑‑Petitioner alleged the detenu to be in custody of police official at some place other than police station‑‑‑Three other persons had also sworn affidavits to that effect‑‑‑police official denied custody of detenu‑‑‑Superintendent of Police was directed to record statements of petitioner and other deponents of affidavits and in case he should find that detenu was in custody of police official, he would order for registration of case against him.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑‑S. 491‑‑‑Habeas corpus
‑‑‑Petitioner alleged the detenu to be in custody of police official at some place other than police station‑‑‑Three other persons had also sworn affidavits to that effect‑‑‑police official denied custody of detenu‑‑‑Superintendent of Police was directed to record statements of petitioner and other deponents of affidavits and in case he should find that detenu was in custody of police official, he would order for registration of case against him. Kh. Muhammad Sharif‑for Petitioner. Maqbool Elahi Malik, A.‑G. (Punjab) for Respondent.. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, Safeer Ahmed, the detenu is still in the custody of the respondent Police Officer and that he is confined somewhere else other than .the police station. In support of his plea, learned counsel has placed on record three affidavits of Muhammad Sharif, Abdul Sattar and Muhammad Safdar. The Police Officer states that Safeer Ahmed is not in his custody.
2. The Superintendent of Police Lahore City is directed to record the statement of Muhammad Saeed Shad, petitioner, and that of three other persons who have sworn affidavits before this Court. In case he finds on the basis of evidence to be collected by him that the detenu is in the custody of respondent Police Officer, he may issue direction for registration of a case against him. With these observations, this petition is disposed of. SA./M‑3220/L Order accordingly.