PCRLJ 1983

1983 P Cr (PLP)

MULAIM‑Petitioner/Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous in Criminal Appeal No. 459 of 1981, decided on 1st September,‑ 1981.
Honorable Judges
Muhammad Munir Khan, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1983 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Muhammad Munir Khan, J
Parties MULAIM‑Petitioner/Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1983 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1983 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Munir Khan, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1983 P Cr (PLP) (MULAIM‑Petitioner/Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑

Representation

  • Awan Muhammad Hanif Khan for Appellant.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑ S. 426 ‑ Sentence, suspension of ‑ Petitioner sentenced to 5 years' R. I. and fine of Rs. 5,000‑Appeal already admitted to regular hearing‑Petitioner prepared to pay amount of fine to heirs of deceased‑Sentence suspended on petitioner's depositing amount of fine in circumstances of case. Nazar Hussain Dogar for the State.

Judgment & Decree

Criminal Miscellaneous in Criminal Appeal No. 459 of 1981, decided on 1st September,‑ 1981. ‑‑‑ S. 426 ‑ Sentence, suspension of ‑ Petitioner sentenced to 5 years' R. I. and fine of Rs. 5,000‑Appeal already admitted to regular hearing‑Petitioner prepared to pay amount of fine to heirs of deceased‑Sentence suspended on petitioner's depositing amount of fine in circumstances of case. Awan Muhammad Hanif Khan for Appellant. Nazar Hussain Dogar for the State. S. H. O. has not produced Alam Khan son of Babu Khan caste Rajput complainant. The learned counsel submits that the petitioner, is prepared to pay the amount of fine of Rs. 5,000 to the heirs of the deceased Ghulam Qadir. The appeal has already been admitted for regular hearing. The sentence is 5 years R. I. In these circumstances the execution of sentence is suspended provided the petitioner deposits Rs. 5,000 (as offered by him) before the trial Court which the trial Court would pay to the heirs of the deceased after verification and furnishes bail bond the sum of Rs. 10,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. M.Y.M. Sentence suspended.