1985 P Cr (PLP)
IMDAD ALI Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1985 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Qurban Sadiq Ikram, J |
| Parties | IMDAD ALI Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1985 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1985 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Qurban Sadiq Ikram, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1985 P Cr (PLP) (IMDAD ALI Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Azim for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S.497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Bail pressed on grounds that only simple injuries attributed to petitioner; trial not concluded despite lapse of one year and 9 months since occurrence and question of common intention yet to be determined during trial‑‑Points raised by petitioner, held, would require consideration after recording of evidence‑‑Petition dismissed, in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous No.2037/B of 1984, decided on 25th July, 1984. ‑‑‑S.497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Bail pressed on grounds that only simple injuries attributed to petitioner; trial not concluded despite lapse of one year and 9 months since occurrence and question of common intention yet to be determined during trial‑‑Points raised by petitioner, held, would require consideration after recording of evidence‑‑Petition dismissed, in circumstances. Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Azim for Petitioner. This is 2nd application by Imdad Ali petitioner for bail. The facts are stated in the F.I.R. lodged on 13‑10‑1982 by Muhammad Afzal complainant. It is stated therein that, he alongwith Latif, was proceeding towards the factory of Zafar and when they were in Chowk he saw that his brother Arshad Mahmood with revolver, Tariq Majeed and Shahid Majeed armed with Chhuris and Imdad Ali (petitioner) armed with Khunjar near the house of Faiz Ahmad. In the view of the witnesses Abdul Majeed raised a Lalkara whereafter Shahid Majeed gave a Chhurri blow hitting his back and Imdad Ali (petitioner) gave Khanjar blow hitting his chest who started running towards the complainant, at that time Tariq Majeed gave Chhurri blow on the thigh of Arshad Mahmood. Then Muhammad Afzal complainant and Latif tried to rescue him. Thereafter Abdul Majeed fired two shots at the complainant party, but none was injured. Arshad Mahmood fell at some distance in front of the house of Nadeem Ahmad. The petitioner was arrested. He moved an application for bail which was dismissed earlier and this is the 2nd application as stated above.
2. In support of this petition it is contended that occurrence took place on 13‑10‑1982 but the trial has not yet commenced /concluded and as such the petitioner be allowed bail. It is further contended that simple injuries have been attributed to the petitioner. It is, therefore, argued that the common intention will be determined during the trial and as such it is a case of further inquiry.
3. I have considered the above arguments. The points raised by the learned counsel will be considered after recording of the evidence. I find no merit in this petition which is dismissed accordingly. S. G. D. Bail refused.