1994 P Cr (PLP)
RAFAQUAT and others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1994 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | RAFAQUAT and others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 P Cr (PLP) (RAFAQUAT and others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Mian Muhammad Saeed for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.337-F/34
Offence with which the accused were charged was not hit by the prohibitory clause of 5.497, Cr.P.C.
Injury sustained was on the non-vital part of the body-- Accused were in judicial custody for over three months and were no longer required by the Police
Accused were neither previous convicts nor hardened criminals
Judgment & Decree
Mian Muhammad Saeed for Petitioners. Muhammad Naeem for the State. Date of hearing: 24th January, 1994. The petitioners are accused of offence under section 337-F/34, P.P.C. vide F.I.R. No.475/93, dated 12-10-1993, registered at Police Station Saddar Kasur.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners and the State were heard at length in respect of the contentions raised herein. Admittedly, the offence alleged is not hit by the prohibitory clause, as the punishment for the same is five years' R.I. and that the injury sustained is on the non-vital part of the body. Furthermore, the petitioners have been in the judicial custody for over three months and are no longer required by the police and they are neither previous convicts nor hardened criminals.
3. Therefore, the petitioners are hereby allowed bail in the sum of Rs.25,000 each with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the A.C./Duty Magistrate, Kasur. N.H.Q./R-129/L Bail allowed.