2006 PLP 1544 (SCMR)
ADNAN HUSSAIN and others — Petitioners Versus GHULAM HAIDER and others — Respondents
| Citation | 2006 PLP 1544 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Mian Muhammad Ajmal and Syed Deedar Hussain Shah, JJ |
| Parties | ADNAN HUSSAIN and others — Petitioners Versus GHULAM HAIDER and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Land Reforms Regulation (1972) [M.L.R.115] |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 PLP 1544 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Land Reforms Regulation (1972) [M.L.R.115] as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 PLP 1544 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Mian Muhammad Ajmal and Syed Deedar Hussain Shah, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 PLP 1544 (SCMR) (ADNAN HUSSAIN and others — Petitioners Versus GHULAM HAIDER and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Riyasat Ali, Advocate Supreme Court with Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners.
- Malik Noor Muhammad Awan, Advocate Supreme Court and M. Ozair Chughtai, Advocate-on-Record for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: -16th July, 2004.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment/order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 23-10-2001, passed in Writ Petitions Nos.2693 of 1990, 3046 of 1991 and 1525 of 1991, respectively).
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)
Leave to appeal was granted to consider whether impugned judgment was against the facts and law laid down by Supreme Court; whether order of Chairman, Federal Land Commission had done substantial justice and was not liable to be set aside in equitable Constitutional jurisdiction; and whether tenants had no locus standi or cause of action to file Constitutional petition.
Judgment & Decree
SYED DEEDAR HUSSAIN SHAH, J.
By this common order we intend to dispose of the above-mentioned petitions for leave to appeal, which are directed against a consolidated judgment of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 23-10-2001, passed in Writ' Petitions Nos.2693 of 1990, 3046 of 1991 and 1525 of 1991, respectively. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, leave to appeal is granted in the above-mentioned petitions, inter alia, to consider the following points:-- (i) Whether the impugned judgment is against the facts and law laid down by this Court? (ii) Whether order, dated 18-3-1990 of the Chairman, Federal Land Commission has done substantial justice and was not liable to be set aside in equitable writ jurisdiction? (iii) Whether the tenants have no locus standi or cause of action to A file writ petition. Operation of the impugned judgment is suspended till the final decisions of the appeals. Leave to appeal granted. H.B.T-/A-124/SC Leave granted.