2017 PLP 1248 (YLR)
ABU BAKAR — Applicant Versus IIND ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, DADU and 2 others — Respondents
| Citation | 2017 PLP 1248 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Sindh (Hyderabad Bench) |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, J |
| Parties | ABU BAKAR — Applicant Versus IIND ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, DADU and 2 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2017 PLP 1248 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2017 PLP 1248 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Sindh (Hyderabad Bench) bench comprising: Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2017 PLP 1248 (YLR) (ABU BAKAR — Applicant Versus IIND ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, DADU and 2 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Aslam P. Sipio for Respondent No.2.
Headnotes / Summary
S.526
Case had been sought to be transferred to another District on the grounds that accused would not be adequately and properly defended on account of alleged influence of the complainant party, who had extended threats to him and that accused could not engage the counsel of his choice in view of said influence
No proof of any threats allegedly caused to the accused or his other family members had been shown
Accused had not brought to the notice of Trial Court about such situation
Record of Trial Court showed that accused himself had submitted an application for withdrawal of power of his counsel and since then, he had not engaged any counsel
Case could not be transferred on such vague grounds
Application for transfer of case was dismissed accordingly. Ghulamullah Chang for Applicant.