1986 P Cr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD YAMIN and others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE Respondent
| Citation | 1986 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD YAMIN and others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD YAMIN and others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Ijaz Muhammad Bhatti for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.148. 307, 324 & 325/149--Bail, grant of--Vicarious liability--Parties at loggerheads with each other- Accused allegedly attacked complainant party, injuring number of persons--Vicarious liability, held was yet to be gone into after appraisal of evidence, bail granted in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 218/B of 1985, decided on 13th March, 1985.
S. 497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.148. 307, 324 & 325/149--Bail, grant of--Vicarious liability--Parties at loggerheads with each other- Accused allegedly attacked complainant party, injuring number of persons--Vicarious liability, held was yet to be gone into after appraisal of evidence, bail granted in circumstances. Ijaz Muhammad Bhatti for Petitioners. Abdul Rashid for the State. The petitioners are involved in a case under sections 307, 325, 324 and 148/149, P.P.C. They have petitioned for being released on bail. 2. According to the F.I.R. the accused party has initiated criminal proceedings against the complainant party under section 452/34, P.P.C., and section 13 of the Arms Ordinance No. XX of 1965. These cases are under the investigation of the C.I.A. staff. Both the parties were at loggerheads on account of the criminal cases. On 7-11-1984 at about 11-00 a.m. the petitioners alongwith others attacked the complainant party and injured a number of persons. Muhammad Siddique is stated to have given a Sots blow to Zafar Hussain on his left scapula and the left arm. Similarly all the petitioners who were armed with Sotas had inflicted simple injuries to their victims. The vicarious liability of the petitioners is yet to be gone into after the appraisal of evidence. I allow them bail in the sum of Rs.15,000 each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner, Lodhran till the disposal of the case against them. S. A. Bail granted.