1983 P Cr (PLP)
SAEED AHMAD‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
| Citation | 1983 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Sajjad Ali Shah, J |
| Parties | SAEED AHMAD‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1983 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1983 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Sajjad Ali Shah, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1983 P Cr (PLP) (SAEED AHMAD‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 497‑Bail, grant of‑ [Murderous Assault]‑Medical report showing injured having sustained two injuries but nature of injuries kept under observation and final medical opinion yet to be given‑Petitioner allowed bail ad interim in circumstances. Akhlaq Ahmed for Applicant. A. A. Mohamedally, Asstt. A.‑G. for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Bail Application No. 750 of 1981, decided on 7th October, 1981. ‑‑‑S. 497‑Bail, grant of‑ [Murderous Assault]‑Medical report showing injured having sustained two injuries but nature of injuries kept under observation and final medical opinion yet to be given‑Petitioner allowed bail ad interim in circumstances. Akhlaq Ahmed for Applicant. A. A. Mohamedally, Asstt. A.‑G. for the State. Applicant is being tried for offence under section 307, P. P. C. and it is alleged that he caused injuries with knife blows to Ghulam Rasool. The incident took place, on 31st July, 1981 at 8 p.m. and report was lodged by complainant War Ahmed, who is an eye‑witness, on the same day at 11.25 p. m. Medical report shows that injured ha sustained two injuries and the final medical opinion is not given and nature of injuries is kept reserved. The learned counsel for the applicant states that injured was in hospital for four days only and was thereafter released. On two occasions in this Court efforts were made by learned A. A.‑G. to obtain final medical report but he had failed in the attempts. In these circumstances applicant is admitted to ad interim bail in the sum of Rs. 10,000 with one surety and P. R. in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. S. G. D. Bail granted