1990 P Cr (PLP)
Before Ijaz Nisar, 7 Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1990 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Ijaz Nisar, 7 |
| Parties | Before Ijaz Nisar, 7 Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Ijaz Nisar, 7.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1990 P Cr (PLP) (Before Ijaz Nisar, 7 Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Rana Muhammad Anwar for Petitioners
Headnotes / Summary
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
S. 426
Penal Code (XL V of 1860), Ss.302 & 148/149
Statutory ground
Appeal could not be decided within statutory period
Co-accused were released on bail on the same ground
Sentence was suspended and bail granted in circumstances. Sardar Khurshid for the State.
Judgment & Decree
S. 426
Penal Code (XL V of 1860), Ss.302 & 148/149
Statutory ground
Appeal could not be decided within statutory period
Co-accused were released on bail on the same ground
Sentence was suspended and bail granted in circumstances. Rana Muhammad Anwar for Petitioners Sardar Khurshid for the State. Khalid Hussain and Sher Muhammad petitioners alongwith four others stand convicted on 18-2-1987 under sections 302 and 148 P.P.C. They were awarded life imprisonment plus fine under section 302 P.P.C. and one year R.I. plus fine under section 148 P.P.C. Both the sentences were to run concurrently.
2. They have applied for suspension of sentences on the ground that their appeal could not be disposed of within the statutory period and further that the sentences of their co-accused stand suspended by this Court for non-disposal of the appeal within the statutory period.
3. Learned counsel for the State has not opposed 'the application. Consequently the petition is granted and the sentences of the petitioners are suspended subject to their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.25,000 (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C. Hafizabad. SA./K-245/Li Bail allowed.