1987 PLP 1690(1) (MLD)
SHAUKAT MAHMOOD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1987 PLP 1690(1) (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Rafiq Tarar, J |
| Parties | SHAUKAT MAHMOOD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 1690(1) (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 1690(1) (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Rafiq Tarar, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 1690(1) (MLD) (SHAUKAT MAHMOOD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Liaqat Ali Sindhu for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 1st March, 1987.
Headnotes / Summary
S.497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.336 & 379--Bail, grant of- Co-accused already granted bail--Case of accused at par with his co-accused--Bail granted in circumstances. M. Salim Shad for the State.
Judgment & Decree
S.497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.336 & 379--Bail, grant of- Co-accused already granted bail--Case of accused at par with his co-accused--Bail granted in circumstances. Ch. Liaqat Ali Sindhu for Petitioner. M. Salim Shad for the State. Date of hearing: 1st March, 1987. This is a petition for bail on behalf of Shaukat Mahmood, petitioner who is involved in a case registered under sections 379 and 336, P.P.C. 2. Bail is claimed on the ground that the case of the petitioner is on better footing than that of co-accused Asghar who has since been released on bail by this Court vide order dated 1-2-1987, passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 56-B of 1987. 3. Muhammad Asghar accused was allowed bail mainly on the ground that in the recovery menu it had been stated that Hadayat Ullah, complainant had produced the stolen money (Rs.151) before the Investigating Officer which had been earlier recovered from Shaukat Mahmood (petitioner herein) but in the F.I.R. it was stated that / currency notes of the value of Rs. 1561 were recovered from Muhammad Iqbal. The case of the petitioner is at par with that of co-accused Muhammad Asghar. In the circumstances, I admit the petitioner to bail in the sum of Rs. 10,000 with one surety in the like amount t the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner, Gujranwala. S.A./S-69/L Bail granted.