2012 PLP 1507 (MLD)
EJAZ AHMAD TARAR and 2 others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents
| Citation | 2012 PLP 1507 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | EJAZ AHMAD TARAR and 2 others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2012 PLP 1507 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2012 PLP 1507 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2012 PLP 1507 (MLD) (EJAZ AHMAD TARAR and 2 others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Azam Nazeer Tarar for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
Ss. 498 & 345
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.395/412
Dacoity, dishonestly receiving property stolen in the commission of a dacoity
Ad interim pre-arrest bail, confirmation of
Agreement to compensate complainant
Complainant had stated in court that he would have no objection to the confirmation of interim pre-arrest bail of the accused persons and would not pursue the case against them if the loss suffered by him was compensated by the accused
Accused accepted the offer of the complainant and paid cash amount to the complainant after which both parties stated that they had no objection on the confirmation of bail before arrest and complainant agreed not to pursue the case to the extent of the accused
Interim bail before arrest allowed to accused was confirmed, in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
MANZOOR AHMAD MALIK, J.
Ejaz Ahmad Tarar, Muzaffar Ali Tarar and Muhammad Ashraf alias Arshad, petitioners seeks bail before arrest in case F.I.R. No.189 dated 30-6-2011 registered under section 395, P.P.C. (later on, section 412, P.P.C. was added) at Police Station Sukheki Mandi District Hafizabad.
2. Abid Mahmood, complainant present in person (duly identified by the police officer present in Court and his learned counsel) states that he will have no objection on the confirmation of the interim pre-arrest bail of the petitioner if the loss suffered by him in this transaction is compensated by the petitioners. He further states that in that eventuality (compensation of loss) he will not pursue the case against all the petitioners. The complainant claims that he suffered a loss of Rs.4,00,000 (rupees four lac) as his tractor along with trailer was stolen. The petitioners have accepted this offer and paid a cash amount of Rs.4,00,000 (rupees four lac) to the complainant who acknowledged the receipt of the same. After that the complainant and his learned counsel have jointly stated that they have no objection on the confirmation of bail before arrest already allowed to the petitioners. The complainant has further stated that he will not pursue this case to the extent of the petitioners.
3. In this situation, learned Deputy Prosecutor-General also has no objection on the confirmation of bail before arrest already allowed to the petitioners.
4. In this situation, this petition is allowed and the interim bail before arrest already allowed to the petitioners is confirmed. M.W.A./E-2/L Pre-arrest bail confirmed.