2005 PLP 1965 (YLR)
ABDUL GHAFFAR and others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2005 PLP 1965 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Khawaja Muhammad Sharif, J |
| Parties | ABDUL GHAFFAR and others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2005 PLP 1965 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2005 PLP 1965 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Khawaja Muhammad Sharif, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2005 PLP 1965 (YLR) (ABDUL GHAFFAR and others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Date of hearing: 10th January, 2005.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Trial of case having started, Court without going into the merits, of case, dismissed bail petition. Ch. Muhammad Riaz and M.A. Zafar for Complainant. Syed Faisal Raza Bukhari for the State.
Judgment & Decree
It is "contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that co-accused Nisar was allowed bail by this Court, that offence alleged against the petitioner does not fall within the ambit of section 497(1), Cr.P.C., that petitioner party had also lodged case F.I.R. No.70 against the complainant in the same police station and that case of the petitioner is of further inquiry falling under subsection (2) of section 497, Cr.P.C.
2. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State assisted by learned counsel for the complainant submits that petitioner was armed with hatchet and Dattar, that there are 13 injuries on the person of Muhammad Anwar injured, that trial has started, charge has been framed, that on the last three dates of hearing witnesses were present but on two dates of hearing learned counsel for the petitioner did not appear before the trial Court and on the last date of hearing, learned Court was on leave.
3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. As the trial has started, so without going into the merits of the case, this petition is dismissed. H.B.T./A-461/L Petition dismissed.