1999 PLP 2253 (MLD)
RAEES AHMED — Applicant Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents
| Citation | 1999 PLP 2253 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | RAEES AHMED — Applicant Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1999 PLP 2253 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1999 PLP 2253 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1999 PLP 2253 (MLD) (RAEES AHMED — Applicant Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Headnotes / Summary
Ss. 561-A, 112, 107, 117 & 151
Order passed by Magistrate was a cyclostyle one and Magistrate had only filled in the blanks
Order to keep peace was for a period of one year which had expired-- Order having been passed by Magistrate in a mechanical manner without applying judicial mind
Proceedings were ordered to be quashed accordingly.
Judgment & Decree
Whereas, it has been made to appear to me by credible information from S.H.O., Police Station Korangi that and on the basis of that information I am satisfied that you are likely to commit breach of peace or by which break of peace will probably be occasioned. You are, therefore, hereby required to show cause why you should not be entered into a personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000 each to keep peace for a period of one year with one surety in the like amount and that you keep the peace for the said term. Given under my hand and seal of the Court. This 14th day of December, 1996. (Sd.) (Asstt. Commissioner & SDM, Landhi/Korangi. Karachi East Order under section 113 Cr.P.C. The opponent produced in Police custody and the substance of the order under section 112., Cr.P.C. read over and explained to the opponent in the language to which he/they understand. (Sd.) (Asstt. Commissioner & SDM, Landhi/Korangi) " The order under section 112, Cr.P.C. shows that it was passed in a mechanical manner without applying judicial mind. It appears to be a cyclostyle one and Magistrate has only filled in the blanks. The order under section 112, Cr.P.C. was passed on 14-12-1996 for a period of one year. The period of one year expired on or about 14-12-1997 and we are now in 1998, even on this score proceedings have become infructuous. Consequently, application under section 561-A, Cr.P.C. is allowed and proceedings pending before the Court of Assistant Commissioner and S.D.M., 8 Landhi/Korangi, Karachi (East), in Case No. of 1996 (State (Dilbari Begum) v. Rais Ahmed), are hereby quashed. Q.M.H./M.A.K./R. 64/K Proceedings quashed