2017 PLP 1134 (YLR)
GHULAM-UD-DIN — Petitioner Versus The STATE through ANF Gilgit — Respondent
| Citation | 2017 PLP 1134 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court |
| Bench Members | Sahib Khan, C.J. and Malik Haq Nawaz, J |
| Parties | GHULAM-UD-DIN — Petitioner Versus The STATE through ANF Gilgit — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2017 PLP 1134 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2017 PLP 1134 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court bench comprising: Sahib Khan, C.J. and Malik Haq Nawaz, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2017 PLP 1134 (YLR) (GHULAM-UD-DIN — Petitioner Versus The STATE through ANF Gilgit — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Saleem for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497(2)
Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), S.9(c)
Possessing and trafficking narcotics
Police official who lodged FIR in the case, was also investigator of the case
Propriety demanded that in a case where an FIR was lodged by a Police Official, he should avoid to conduct the investigation; as his investigation, howsoever fair, could be challenged by accused on the ground that a fair and impartial investigation had not been carried out; which had prejudiced the case
Accused who was below the age of 18 years, was in judicial lock-up since last 8 months without any substantial progress in the trial, was the first offender and there was no chance of his abscontion, or tampering with the case
Case of accused fell within the ambit of further inquiry
Bail, was allowed to accused, in circumstances. PLD 1997 SC 408 ref. Manzoor Hussain Special Prosecutor for ANF.