2010 PLP 335 (GBLR)
PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Gilgit-Baltistan and 4 others — Petitioners Versus KHALID MEHMOOD and 64 others — Respondents
| Citation | 2010 PLP 335 (GBLR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Appellate Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi, C.J., Syed Jaffar Shah and Muhammad Yaqoob, JJ |
| Parties | PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Gilgit-Baltistan and 4 others — Petitioners Versus KHALID MEHMOOD and 64 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Gilgit-Baltistan (Empowerment and Self-Governance) Order, 2009 |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2010 PLP 335 (GBLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Gilgit-Baltistan (Empowerment and Self-Governance) Order, 2009 as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2010 PLP 335 (GBLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Appellate Court bench comprising: Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi, C.J., Syed Jaffar Shah and Muhammad Yaqoob, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2010 PLP 335 (GBLR) (PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Gilgit-Baltistan and 4 others — Petitioners Versus KHALID MEHMOOD and 64 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- ----Art. 60(13)---Petition for leave to appeal---Advocate-General during the course of arguments, when confronted that the case before the Chief Court was still in adjudication and that the petitioner could raise all issues at the final stage before the Chief Court, he, without further pressing the petition, requested for withdrawal of the same reserving the right of raising the point taken in the petition before the Chief Court---Petition for leave to appeal was accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.
- Advocate-General for, Gilgit-Baltistan.
- Ali Nazar, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners.
- Learned Advocate-General during the course of arguments when confronted that the case before the Chief Court is still in adjudication and petitioner can raise all issues at the final stage before the Chief Court, he without further pressing this petition has requested for withdrawal of the same reserving the right of raising the point taken in this petition before the Chief Court. This petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn:
Headnotes / Summary
Art. 60(13)
Advocate-General during the course of arguments, when confronted that the case before the Chief Court was still in adjudication and that the petitioner could raise all issues at the final stage before the Chief Court, he, without further pressing the petition, requested for withdrawal of the same reserving the right of raising the point taken in the petition before the Chief Court
Petition for leave to appeal was accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.
Judgment & Decree
Learned Advocate-General during the course of arguments when confronted that the case before the Chief Court is still in adjudication and petitioner can raise all issues at the final stage before the Chief Court, he without further pressing this petition has requested for withdrawal of the same reserving the right of raising the point taken in this petition before the Chief Court. This petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn: H.B.T./60/Glt. Order accordingly.