2004 PLP 1714 (CLD)
MUHAMMAD AKRAM CHAUDHARY‑‑‑Petitioner Versus STYLE ENTERPRISES (PVT.) LIMITED‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 2004 PLP 1714 (CLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Sayeed Akhtar, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD AKRAM CHAUDHARY‑‑‑Petitioner Versus STYLE ENTERPRISES (PVT.) LIMITED‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Companies (Court) Rules, 1997‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2004 PLP 1714 (CLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Companies (Court) Rules, 1997‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2004 PLP 1714 (CLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Sayeed Akhtar, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2004 PLP 1714 (CLD) (MUHAMMAD AKRAM CHAUDHARY‑‑‑Petitioner Versus STYLE ENTERPRISES (PVT.) LIMITED‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- ‑‑‑‑R.78, Form 27‑‑‑Advertisement of petition in News papers‑‑‑Petitioner, vide a preceding order was directed to make arrangements for advertising petition in two specified Newspapers and that if petition was not advertised before the next date of hearing, petition would stand dismissed‑‑‑Said order of the Court having not been complied with, petition was dismissed.
- Nemo for Petitioner.
- Mian Ijaz Ahmad for Counsel for respondent- Company.
Headnotes / Summary
Judgment & Decree
C.O. No. 15 of 2003, decided on 5th June, 2003. ‑‑‑‑R.78, Form 27‑‑‑Advertisement of petition in News papers‑‑‑Petitioner, vide a preceding order was directed to make arrangements for advertising petition in two specified Newspapers and that if petition was not advertised before the next date of hearing, petition would stand dismissed‑‑‑Said order of the Court having not been complied with, petition was dismissed. Nemo for Petitioner. Mian Ijaz Ahmad for Counsel for respondent- Company. Sahibzada Anwar Hameed for Bank of Punjab. Vide preceding order dated 7‑5‑2003 the petitioner was directed to make arrangements for advertising the petition in the daily newspapers "The News" and "Nawa‑e-Waqt". It was further ordered that if the petition is not advertised in Form 27 under rule 78 of Companies (Court) Rules, 1997, before the next date of hearing the petition will stand dismissed. The order of this Court has not been complied with. The petition is dismissed. H.B.T./M‑687/L Petition dismissed accordingly.