SCMR 1968

1968 SCMR 291 (2) (PLP)

Mst. REHMAT BIBI-Petitioner Versus NATHE KHAN AND OTHERS-Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
ORDER ON FACTS ONLY
Decided Date
Civil Appeal No 54 of 1965 decided on 14th December 1967.
Honorable Judges
A. R. Cornelius, C. J., S. A. Rahman, Fazle-Akbar, Hamoodur Rahman and
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1968 SCMR 291 (2) (PLP)
Forum / Court ORDER ON FACTS ONLY
Bench Members A. R. Cornelius, C. J., S. A. Rahman, Fazle-Akbar, Hamoodur Rahman and
Parties Mst. REHMAT BIBI-Petitioner Versus NATHE KHAN AND OTHERS-Respondents
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1968 SCMR 291 (2) (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1968 SCMR 291 (2) (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the ORDER ON FACTS ONLY bench comprising: A. R. Cornelius, C. J., S. A. Rahman, Fazle-Akbar, Hamoodur Rahman and.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1968 SCMR 291 (2) (PLP) (Mst. REHMAT BIBI-Petitioner Versus NATHE KHAN AND OTHERS-Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Abdul Hug, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Muhammad Ashraf Israili, Attorney for Petitioner.
  • Abdur Rashid, Senior. Advocate Supreme Court instructed by M. Siddia,Senior Attotney for Respondents Nos. 1 and 2.
  • Raja Said Akbar Khan, Advocate-General West Pakistan instructed by ljaz Ali, Attorney: Amicus curiae.
  • CORNELIUS, C. J.-In compliance with this Court's order of the 10th April 1967, certain documents have been placed on the record by the learned Advocate-General, West Pakistan, but these do not include the particular document required, viz., a notifica tion under section 4 of the Colonization of Government Lands Act, 1912, as in force in Bahawalpur applying the provisions of the Act to the lands in question. In a useful commentary on the Act, by Mr. Altar Hussain, a reference to the relevant notification has been given, viz., No. 19 of 19th May 1926. A copy of this notification should be procured and placed on the record by the learned Advocate-General at an early date, when a further date for conclusion of arguments in the appeal will be fixed.

Headnotes / Summary

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore, dated the 16th June 1961, in Regular First Appeal No. 4 of 1959) (Bahawalpur). [ORDER ON FACTS ONLY]

Judgment & Decree

CORNELIUS, C. J.-In compliance with this Court's order of the 10th April 1967, certain documents have been placed on the record by the learned Advocate-General, West Pakistan, but these do not include the particular document required, viz., a notifica tion under section 4 of the Colonization of Government Lands Act, 1912, as in force in Bahawalpur applying the provisions of the Act to the lands in question. In a useful commentary on the Act, by Mr. Altar Hussain, a reference to the relevant notification has been given, viz., No. 19 of 19th May 1926. A copy of this notification should be procured and placed on the record by the learned Advocate-General at an early date, when a further date for conclusion of arguments in the appeal will be fixed.