1989 PLP 2794 (MLD)
SARFRAZ KHAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE- Respondent
| Citation | 1989 PLP 2794 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Ijaz Nisar, J |
| Parties | SARFRAZ KHAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE- Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 2794 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 2794 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Ijaz Nisar, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 2794 (MLD) (SARFRAZ KHAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE- Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Khalid Ranjha for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 498--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302, 307 & 148/149--Pre-arrest bail, grant of--No direct part in occurrence attributed to accused--Accused an old man of 70 years, found innocent during most of investigations--Interim bail allowed in circumstances. Najam-uz-Zaman, A.A.-G. assisted by Zafar Yasin for the State. M.A. Aziz on bhealf of Raja Muhammad Anwar for the Complainant.
Judgment & Decree
Najam-uz-Zaman, A.A.-G. assisted by Zafar Yasin for the State. M.A. Aziz on bhealf of Raja Muhammad Anwar for the Complainant. The petitioner alongwith others stands charged with the murder of Ahmad son of Shah Muhammad and for murderously assaulting Allah Yar and Rehmat Khan P.Ws. with guns on 9-10-1985.
2. Bail is sought mainly on the ground that no direct part in the occurrence is attributed to the petitioner and the only allegation against him is that he had brought his co-accused to the spot in a jeep. Furthermore that in most of the investigations he was found innocent, not present on the spot at the material time. Lastly, it is contended that he is an old man of 70 years of age.
3. The complainant has prayed for an adjournment as his counsel is not available.
4. In the circumstances mentioned above the petitioner is admitted to interim bail in the sum of Rs.50,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of Deputy Registrar (Judi.) of this Court till 12-4-1989. The petitioner shall personally appear before the Court on all the dates of hearing. S.A./S-417/L Interim bail allowed.