1985 P Cr (PLP)
GHULAM ABBAS‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1985 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Ghulam Mujaddid Mirza, J |
| Parties | GHULAM ABBAS‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1985 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1985 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Ghulam Mujaddid Mirza, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1985 P Cr (PLP) (GHULAM ABBAS‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M. Asghar Bokhari for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑S. 497‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Ss. 10 & 16‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Abductee giving two versions of occurrence, one in her statement before police and other one in her statement recorded under S. 164, 'Cr. P. C.‑‑Abductee initially implicated as accused but later on transposed as a prosecution witness‑ Prosecutrix also legally wedded wife of petitioner‑‑Petitioner allowed bail, in circumstances. Bashir Pervaiz for the State.
Judgment & Decree
‑S. 497‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Ss. 10 & 16‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Abductee giving two versions of occurrence, one in her statement before police and other one in her statement recorded under S. 164, 'Cr. P. C.‑‑Abductee initially implicated as accused but later on transposed as a prosecution witness‑ Prosecutrix also legally wedded wife of petitioner‑‑Petitioner allowed bail, in circumstances. M. Asghar Bokhari for Petitioner. Bashir Pervaiz for the State. According to the learned counsel there are two versions one as given in the statement of Mst. Mehr Khatoon under section 161, Cr. P. C., recorded by Shaukat Ali, Sub Inspector and the other as disclosed in the statement under section 164, Cr. P. C. which was got recorded under pressure with a view to implicating the petitioner. It is further submitted that Mst. Mehr Khatoon who was initialy implicated as an accused was later on transposed as a prosecution witness. Even otherwise she is legally wedded wife of the petitioner. I think these are good grounds to admit the petitioner to bail. He is accordingly allowed bail in the sum of Rs.10,000 (Ten thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner, Mianwali. S. G. D. Bail allowed.