1998 PLP 403 (SCMR)
HABIB ULLAH SABIR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SHAUKAT ALI KAZMI and others‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1998 PLP 403 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Zia Mahmood Mirza, Irshad Hasan Khan and Raja Afrasiab Khan, JJ |
| Parties | HABIB ULLAH SABIR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SHAUKAT ALI KAZMI and others‑‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1998 PLP 403 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1998 PLP 403 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Zia Mahmood Mirza, Irshad Hasan Khan and Raja Afrasiab Khan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1998 PLP 403 (SCMR) (HABIB ULLAH SABIR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SHAUKAT ALI KAZMI and others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Kh. Haris Ahmed, Advocate Supreme Court with Ejaz Ahmed Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 2nd April, 1997.
- Kh. Haris Ahmed, Advocate Supreme Court with Ejaz Ahmed Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑‑Disposal of Constitutional petition pending before High Court‑‑‑Petitioner's only grievance in petition for leave to appeal was that Constitutional petition filed by contesting respondent was at motion stage for the last four months‑‑‑Petition for leave to appeal was disposed of with observation that Constitutional petition filed by respondent should be disposed of expeditiously, preferably within one month.
Judgment & Decree
Civil Petition No.362-L of 1997, decided on 2nd April, 1997.
Art. 185(3)
Disposal of Constitutional petition pending before High Court
Petitioner's only grievance in petition for leave to appeal was that Constitutional petition filed by contesting respondent was at motion stage for the last four months
Petition for leave to appeal was disposed of with observation that Constitutional petition filed by respondent should be disposed of expeditiously, preferably within one month. Kh. Haris Ahmed, Advocate Supreme Court with Ejaz Ahmed Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing: 2nd April, 1997. After arguing the case at quite some length, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the only grievance of the petitioner is that the writ petition filed by respondent No.1 herein is at motion stage for the last four months. That Q' being so, this petition is disposed of with the observation that writ petition No.22766 of 1996 may be disposed of expeditiously, preferably within this month. A.A./H-262/S Order accordingly.