1998 PLP 2724 (SCMR)
MUHAMMAD AZHAR MALIK ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE DIRECTOR, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION (C&G) DIRECTORATE, RAWALPINDI CANTT. and another‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1998 PLP 2724 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Irshad Hasan Khan and Sh. Ijaz Nisar, JJ |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD AZHAR MALIK ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE DIRECTOR, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION (C&G) DIRECTORATE, RAWALPINDI CANTT. and another‑‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Government Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1998 PLP 2724 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Government Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1998 PLP 2724 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Irshad Hasan Khan and Sh. Ijaz Nisar, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1998 PLP 2724 (SCMR) (MUHAMMAD AZHAR MALIK ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE DIRECTOR, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION (C&G) DIRECTORATE, RAWALPINDI CANTT. and another‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Raja Muhammad Bashir, Advocate Supreme Court and Mehr Khan Malik, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Maulvi Anwarul Haq, Deputy Attorney‑General for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 2nd April, 1998.
- Raja Muhammad Bashir, Advocate Supreme Court and Mehr Khan Malik, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Maulvi Anwarul Haq, Deputy Attorney-General for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment/order, dated 4‑9‑1997, of the Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad, passed in Appeal No.9(Q) of 1996). ‑‑‑‑R. 4‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 212(3)‑‑‑Annual Confidential Report‑‑‑Adverse remarks recorded in Annual Confidential Report of civil servant‑‑‑Service Tribunal dismissed civil servant's appeal against adverse remarks‑‑‑Validity‑‑‑Supreme Court with consent of parties directed Secretary of the Department to ensure that disciplinary proceedings initiated against civil servant pursuant to charge‑sheet were completed as expeditiously as possible but not later than 60 days from date of passing of order of Court‑‑‑Petition for leave to appeal was converted into appeal and disposed of in terms of consent of parties‑‑‑Adverse remarks entered in Annual Confidential Report of civil servant would, however, be subject to final result of disciplinary proceedings against civil servant.
Judgment & Decree
IRSHAD HASAN KHAN, J.
This petition under Article 212(3) of the Constitution, is directed against the judgment, dated 4-9-1997, passed by the Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad, dismissing the appeal of the petitioner against adverse remarks recorded in his A.C.R. for the year 1995.
2. With consent of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Deputy Attorney-General, the Secretary, Ministry of Defence, Government of Pakistan, Rawalpindi, is directed to ensure that disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner pursuant to the Charge Sheet No.3400/D-18, dated 29-1-1996, are completed as expeditiously as possible but not later than 60 days from today.
3. Resultantly, the petition is converted into appeal and disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs. Needless to observe that the adverse remarks entered in the A.C.R., of the petitioner shall be subject to final result of the disciplinary proceedings against him. A.A./M-115/S Order accordingly.