1991 PLP 1341 (SCMR)
S. FAYYAZ HUSSAIN NAQVI — Petitioner Versus THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF
| Citation | 1991 PLP 1341 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zullah |
| Parties | S. FAYYAZ HUSSAIN NAQVI — Petitioner Versus THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973), ORDER |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1991 PLP 1341 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973), ORDER as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1991 PLP 1341 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zullah.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1991 PLP 1341 (SCMR) (S. FAYYAZ HUSSAIN NAQVI — Petitioner Versus THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Khawaja Muhammad Farooq, Advocate Supreme Court and Manzoor Ilahi, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- M.A. Siddiqi, Deputy Attorney-General for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 26th June, 1989.
- On the last date of hearing the learned Deputy Attorney-General appeared and sought further time to seek instructions in this behalf.
- Khawaja Muhammad Farooq, Advocate Supreme Court and Manzoor Ilahi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- M.A. Siddiqi, Deputy Attorney‑General for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment dated 23-5-1987 of the Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad in Appeal No.341(R)/84 of 1984).
Art. 212(3)
Questions raised in petition not only were of law of public importance, but also of policy
Leave to appeal was granted. MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.
Leave to appeal has been sought; against the dismissal by the Federal Service Tribunal, of petitioner's service appeal. Another learned Bench had after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner issued notice to the Deputy Attorney-General, as stated, for clarifying certain points raised in the petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner has reiterated the points raised in this petition. We after hearing the learned Deputy Attorney-General feel that the questions raised are not only of law of public importance but also of policy. Accordingly, leave to appeal is granted. The appeal shall be prepared on the present record with direction to the parties to file all essential documents. H.B.T./S-417/S Leave granted.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑‑Art. 212(3)‑‑‑Questions raised in petition not only were of law of public importance, but also of policy‑‑‑Leave to appeal was granted. Khawaja Muhammad Farooq, Advocate Supreme Court and Manzoor Ilahi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner. M.A. Siddiqi, Deputy Attorney‑General for Respondents. Date of hearing: 26th June, 1989. MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑‑Leave to appeal has been sought; against the dismissal by the Federal Service Tribunal, of petitioner's service appeal. Another learned Bench had after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner issued notice to the Deputy Attorney‑General, as stated, for clarifying certain points raised in the petition. On the last date of hearing the learned Deputy Attorney‑General appeared and sought further time to seek instructions in this behalf. Learned counsel for the petitioner has reiterated the points raised in this petition. We after hearing the learned Deputy Attorney‑General feel that the questions raised are not only of law of public importance but also of policy. Accordingly, leave to appeal is granted. The appeal shall be prepared on the present record with direction to the parties to file all essential documents. H.B.T./S‑417/S Leave granted.