1986 PLP 135(2) (SCMR)
MUHAMMAD SAEEDUR REHMAN and others‑‑Appellants Versus D.S.C. JHELUM and others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1986 PLP 135(2) (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Aslam Riaz Hussain, Actg. C.J., Nasim Hasan Shah and S.A. Nusrat, JJ |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD SAEEDUR REHMAN and others‑‑Appellants Versus D.S.C. JHELUM and others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 135(2) (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 135(2) (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Actg. C.J., Nasim Hasan Shah and S.A. Nusrat, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 135(2) (SCMR) (MUHAMMAD SAEEDUR REHMAN and others‑‑Appellants Versus D.S.C. JHELUM and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Nemo for Appellants.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, ACTG. C.J.‑‑The show‑cause notice was issued to the appellants, as their Advocate‑on‑Record had died, for not depositing the security and informing them why the appeal should not be dismissed for non‑prosecution. No one has appeared in response to the show‑cause notice. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed ford non‑prosecution but with no order as to costs.
Headnotes / Summary
(Show‑cause notice). ‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Appeal‑‑Security‑‑No one appearing in the response show cause notice issued for not depositing security Appeal dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Judgment & Decree
(Show‑cause notice). Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑
‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Appeal‑‑Security‑‑No one appearing in the response show cause notice issued for not depositing security Appeal dismissed for non‑prosecution. Nemo for Appellants. Nemo for Respondents. ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, ACTG. C.J.‑‑The show‑cause notice was issued to the appellants, as their Advocate‑on‑Record had died, for not depositing the security and informing them why the appeal should not be dismissed for non‑prosecution. No one has appeared in response to the show‑cause notice. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed ford non‑prosecution but with no order as to costs. M . Y . H . Appeal dismissed.