YLR 2002

2002 PLP 173 (YLR)

MUHAMMAD IMRAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous Nos. 2268-B and 2001, decided on 10th October, 2001.
Honorable Judges
Muhammad Farrukh Mahmud, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2002 PLP 173 (YLR)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Muhammad Farrukh Mahmud, J
Parties MUHAMMAD IMRAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2002 PLP 173 (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2002 PLP 173 (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Farrukh Mahmud, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2002 PLP 173 (YLR) (MUHAMMAD IMRAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Faiz Bakhsh Khan Langah for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

S.497

Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979 Ss. 13/14

Bail, grant of

No warrant of arrest was obtained by the complainant Police Officer and he conducted the raid in violation: of the Fundamental Rights guaranteed by the Constitution

First Information Report ha d nowhere mentioned that the apprehended lady and the male were committing Zina

No offence prima facie was made out against the accused under Ss. 13/14 of Offence of Zina. (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979 and further probe was needed into the guilt of the accused

Bail was granted to the accused. Muhammad Tariq Mehmood for the State.

Judgment & Decree

S.497

Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979 Ss. 13/14

Bail, grant of

No warrant of arrest was obtained by the complainant Police Officer and he conducted the raid in violation: of the Fundamental Rights guaranteed by the Constitution

First Information Report ha d nowhere mentioned that the apprehended lady and the male were committing Zina

No offence prima facie was made out against the accused under Ss. 13/14 of Offence of Zina. (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979 and further probe was needed into the guilt of the accused

Bail was granted to the accused. Faiz Bakhsh Khan Langah for Petitioner. Muhammad Tariq Mehmood for the State. Muhammad Imran petitioner has sought his post-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No. 210 of 2001 registered on 28-8-2001 at Police Station Kot Sultan, District Layyah, for offences under sections 13/14 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979.

2. A perusal of the F.I.R. shows that the complainant Ghulam Abbas, A.S.I. received an information that a prostitution den was being run by one Nisar Hussain and, therefore, the complainant formed a raiding party and conducted the raid. During the raid the complainant found one lady and a person lying together on a cot who were apprehended by the complainant. It is further stated in the F.I.R. that on inquiry the apprehended persons disclosed their names as Muhammad Imran and Mst. Nasim Mai. The petitioner, after his arrest is in the judicial lock-up.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the State and have perused the record. It has been noticed that no warrant of arrest was obtained by the complainant and he conducted the raid in violation of the Fundamental Rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. It is .A nowhere mentioned in the F.I.R. that the apprehended lady and the male were committing zina. In these circumstances, prima facie, no offence is made out under sections 13/14 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979 and further probe is needed into the guilt of the petitioner.

4. In these circumstances I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail subject to his furnishing of bail bond in the sum of Rs 5,000 (Rupees five thousand only) with one surety in the like am, the learned trial Court. H.B.T/M-952/L Bail granted.