1989 PLP 321 (SCMR)
ALLAH RA KHA — Petitioner Versus THE COMMISSIONER, SARGODHA DIVISION and others — Respondents
| Citation | 1989 PLP 321 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Shafiur Rahman and Ghulam Mujaddid, JJ |
| Parties | ALLAH RA KHA — Petitioner Versus THE COMMISSIONER, SARGODHA DIVISION and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 321 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 321 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Shafiur Rahman and Ghulam Mujaddid, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 321 (SCMR) (ALLAH RA KHA — Petitioner Versus THE COMMISSIONER, SARGODHA DIVISION and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Mushtaq Masood, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Mehdi Khan Mchtab, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Ijaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate-on-Record and 1ltaf Muhammad Khan, Advocate Supreme Court for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 7th August, 1988.
- Ch. Mushtaq Masood, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Mehdi Khan Mchtab, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Ijaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record and 1ltaf Muhammad Khan, Advocate Supreme Court for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the judgment of Punjab Service Tribunal dated 20-9-1982 in Appeal No. 588/141 of 1981).
Art. 212(3)-.Civil service--Adverse remarks--Petitioner, in whose annual confidential report adverse entry was recorded, unable to point out any error of law or question of public importance which required examination--leave to., appeal refused.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑Art. 212(3)‑.Civil service‑‑Adverse remarks‑‑Petitioner, in whose annual confidential report adverse entry was recorded, unable to point out any error of law or question of public importance which required examination‑‑leave to., appeal refused. Ch. Mushtaq Masood, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Mehdi Khan Mchtab, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner. Ijaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record and 1ltaf Muhammad Khan, Advocate Supreme Court for Respondents. Date of hearing: 7th August, 1988. GHULAM MUJADDID, J.‑Punjab Service Tribunal by order dated 20‑9‑1982 dismissed the appeal filed by Allah Rakha petitioner against the: adverse entry recorded in his annual confidential report for the year 1972. , He now seeks leave to appeal against the aforesaid order of the Tribunal. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. He was unable to point out any error of law or question of public importance which needs examination. The order of the Tribunal being in accordance with law calls for not interference. It is not a fit case for leave to appeal. M.Y.H./A‑325/S Petition dismissed.