1991 PLP 774 (SCMR)
UMER BIBI and others — Petitioners Versus SALIMUDDIN and others — Respondents
| Citation | 1991 PLP 774 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | ----Art. 185(3)---Mesne profit---No grievance with regard to mesne profits having been made by petitioner in his Constitutional petition before High Court there was no justifiable reason to interfere in order as regard mesne profits: --Mesne profit. |
| Bench Members | Abdul Shakurul Salam and |
| Parties | UMER BIBI and others — Petitioners Versus SALIMUDDIN and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1991 PLP 774 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1991 PLP 774 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the ----Art. 185(3)---Mesne profit---No grievance with regard to mesne profits having been made by petitioner in his Constitutional petition before High Court there was no justifiable reason to interfere in order as regard mesne profits: --Mesne profit. bench comprising: Abdul Shakurul Salam and.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1991 PLP 774 (SCMR) (UMER BIBI and others — Petitioners Versus SALIMUDDIN and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 30th January, 1990.
- Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order dated 1-7-1987 of the Lahore High Court, Lahore passed in W.P. No. 888-R of 1980).
Art. 185(3)
Mesne profit
No grievance with regard to mesne profits having been made by petitioner in his Constitutional petition before High Court there was no justifiable reason to interfere in order as regard mesne profits: --[Mesne profit].
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑‑Mesne profit‑‑‑No grievance with regard to mesne profits having been made by petitioner in his Constitutional petition before High Court there was no justifiable reason to interfere in order as regard mesne profits: ‑‑[Mesne profit]. Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing: 30th January, 1990. ABDUL SHAKURUL SALAM, J: ‑‑Petitioners claimed occupancy rights in evacuee land which were denied to them by the Deputy Custodian, Evacuee Properties, vide order dated 24‑3‑1976 and it was held that they were "liable to pay Batai share according to the practice prevailing in the area right from 1‑3‑1947 till the date of confirmation of the allotment of the land in question which should form part of the Compensation Pool". This is vide order dated 24‑3‑1976. Their revision petition was dismissed by the learned Custodian, Evacuee Property, Lahore vide order dated 20‑9‑1980. They Filed a Writ Petition No. 888/R/1980, wherein claim to the land was given up, but it was prayed that they be allowed relief as regards the order of mesne profits. The petition was dismissed for the reason that no such contention was raised in the writ petition. This is vide order dated 1‑7‑1987. Petitioners seek leave to appeal.
2. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, we find no justifiable reason to interfere in the order as regards the mesne profits about which no grievance was made in the writ petition filed in the High Court.
3. Petition is, therefore, dismissed. H.B.T./U‑35/S Petition dismissed.