1987 P Cr (PLP)
ZULFIQAR ALI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1987 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Ijaz Nisar J |
| Parties | ZULFIQAR ALI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1998) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1998) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Ijaz Nisar J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 P Cr (PLP) (ZULFIQAR ALI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Naveed Shahryar for petitioner.
- Date of hearing 17th September, 1986.
Headnotes / Summary
S.497
Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (4 of 1979), Art.4
Hail, grant of Recovery of 15 grams of heroin--Report of Chemical Examiner not on judicial record
Accused behind bars for over six months
Hail granted in circumstances. Muhammad Rafi Siddiqui for the State.
Judgment & Decree
S.497
Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (4 of 1979), Art.4
Hail, grant of Recovery of 15 grams of heroin--Report of Chemical Examiner not on judicial record
Accused behind bars for over six months
Hail granted in circumstances. Naveed Shahryar for petitioner. Muhammad Rafi Siddiqui for the State. Date of hearing 17th September, 1986. The case against the petitioner is that 16 grams of Heroin was recovered from his possession on 8th March, 1986. On the last date of hearing record was ordered to be summoned to find out if the report of the Chemical Examiner had been received or not declaring that the recovered material was Heroin.
2. Learned counsel for the State submits that no such report exists on the judicial record. The petitioner is behind the bars for over six months.
3. In view of the above circumstances, I admit the petitioner to bail in the sum of Rs.10,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C., Gujrat, S.A /743/L Bail allowed.