1984 P Cr (PLP)
Mst. NOORAN-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent
| Citation | 1984 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Zafarullah, J |
| Parties | Mst. NOORAN-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1984 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1984 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Zafarullah, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1984 P Cr (PLP) (Mst. NOORAN-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M. M. Jamal for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497/498-Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Ss. 10 & 16-Bail - Accused (woman) obtaining ex parte decree of dissolution of marriage which got set aside ex parte by her husband-Woman marrying another man-Question whether accused believed other man to be her husband when she contracted marriage with him when decree of dissolution with first husband had already been set aside, held, a question of further inquiry-Bail granted. Naeem Rashad for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 422-B of 1983, decided on 13th April, 1983 --S. 497/498-Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Ss. 10 & 16-Bail - Accused (woman) obtaining ex parte decree of dissolution of marriage which got set aside ex parte by her husband-Woman marrying another man-Question whether accused believed other man to be her husband when she contracted marriage with him when decree of dissolution with first husband had already been set aside, held, a question of further inquiry-Bail granted. M. M. Jamal for Petitioner. Naeem Rashad for the State. Mst. Nooran obtained an ex parte decree of dissolution of marriage on 8-12-1982. Sadiq got this ex pane decree set aside on 20-12-198 which order itself was ex parte. Mst. Nooran is said to have married Riaz on 12-3-1983. The question for determination will be whether on 12-3-1983 when the decree of dissolution was/has already been set aside ex parte, she believed Riaz her co-accused to be her husband or not. This is a question of further inquiry. The petitioner is, therefore, allowed bail in the sum of Rs. 10,000 (Rupees ten thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A. C. Mailsi. M. Y. H. Bail granted.