1991 PLP 1804 (SCMR)
FAQIR GUL — Petitioner Versus CHIEF ENGINEER and others — Respondents
| Citation | 1991 PLP 1804 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | S. Usman Ali Shah and Abdul Qadeer Chaudhry JJ |
| Parties | FAQIR GUL — Petitioner Versus CHIEF ENGINEER and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1991 PLP 1804 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1991 PLP 1804 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: S. Usman Ali Shah and Abdul Qadeer Chaudhry JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1991 PLP 1804 (SCMR) (FAQIR GUL — Petitioner Versus CHIEF ENGINEER and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mian Shakirullah Jan, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 14h February, 1990.
- Mian Shakirullah Jan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the judgment of the Federal Service Tribunal dated 24-9-1989, passed in Appeal No.249(P) of 1989).
Art. 212(3)
Petitioner failed to file appeal against order of his dismissal from service within prescribed period of limitation of two months
Appeal filed after expiry of nine years from dismissal, held, was rightly dismissed being barred by time.
Judgment & Decree
S. USMAN ALI SHAH, J.‑The petitioner seeks leave to appeal against the order of the Federal Service Tribunal dated 24‑9‑1989, whereby his appeal against the order of his termination from service as Lineman‑II vide Office Order No. 3689, dated 25‑6‑1979, was dismissed in limine. The petitioner failed to file appeal against the order of his dismissal from service within the prescribed period of limitation of two months and thus appeal preferred by him on 30‑4‑1989 was barred by time. His order of termination of service was neither departmentally appealable nor before the Tribunal after the expiry of nine years and has rightly been dismissed, by the learned Service Tribunal. Hence we do not consider it a fit case for further consideration. Thus, it is dismissed. H.B.T./F‑174/S Petition dismissed.