P L D (Rev (PLP)
Before Akhtar Hussain, F. C. R. & C. Versus R. T. A., LAHORE — Respondent
| Citation | P L D (Rev (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | |
| Bench Members | Akhtar Hussain, F. C. R. & C. |
| Parties | Before Akhtar Hussain, F. C. R. & C. Versus R. T. A., LAHORE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D (Rev (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D (Rev (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the bench comprising: Akhtar Hussain, F. C. R. & C..
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: P L D (Rev (PLP) (Before Akhtar Hussain, F. C. R. & C. Versus R. T. A., LAHORE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Khwaja Abdur Rahim, for Appellant.
Headnotes / Summary
Motor Vehicle‑Private carrier's permit‑Applicant brick kiln owner and Government contractor‑Refusal to renew unjustified,
Judgment & Decree
AKHTAR HUSSAIN, F. C.--‑The renewal of the Private Carrier's permit of the appellant was refused by 'the Regional Transport authority on the ground that he was a brick‑kiln owner and as such he did not require a Private Carrier's permit. My attention has been drawn to the application of the appellant for the renewal of his permit, in which he had noted that he was a Government Contractor besides being a brick kiln owner. He did not require his vehicle merely for his Brick‑kiln, but also needed it for carrying out the other business as a Contractor of the Defence and Railway Departments. I, therefore; do not see that the refusal of the renewal of his permit by the Regional Transport Authority was justified and therefore, accept the appeal and direct that the appellant's permit for a Private Carrier should be renewed. Announced. A. H. Appeal accepted.