2002 PLP 3060(1) (YLR)
ABDUL REHMAN MUJAHID‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 2002 PLP 3060(1) (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Farrukh Mahmud, J |
| Parties | ABDUL REHMAN MUJAHID‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2002 PLP 3060(1) (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2002 PLP 3060(1) (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Farrukh Mahmud, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2002 PLP 3060(1) (YLR) (ABDUL REHMAN MUJAHID‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Mohandra for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S.497‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.168/380/411/109‑‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑‑No allegation of abduction or rape wets against accused‑‑‑No recovery was effected from accused and his case was at par with that of co‑accused who had already been granted bail‑‑‑Rule of consistency demanded that accused should also be released on bail‑‑‑Bail was granted to accused in circumstances. M.A. Farazi for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1133‑B of 2001/BWP, decided on 10th December, 2001. ‑‑‑‑S.497‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.168/380/411/109‑‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑‑No allegation of abduction or rape wets against accused‑‑‑No recovery was effected from accused and his case was at par with that of co‑accused who had already been granted bail‑‑‑Rule of consistency demanded that accused should also be released on bail‑‑‑Bail was granted to accused in circumstances. Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Mohandra for Petitioner. M.A. Farazi for the State. Abdul Rehman Mujahid petitioner has sought his post‑arrest bail in case F.I.R. No.301 of 2001 registered at Police Station Saddar, Rahimyar Khan on 31‑5‑2001 for Offences under sections 16/11/10(3) of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood Ordinance, 1979. During the investigation offences under sections 380/368/411/109, P.P.C were added by the police.
2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have also perused the record. Admittedly, there is no allegation of abduction or rape against the petitioner; no recovery was effected from him and his case is at par with that of Farzand Ali co‑accused who has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 19‑11‑2001. The rule of consistency, therefore, demand, that the petitioner should also be released on bail. Therefore, I admit the petitioner to bail subject to his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.20,000 (Rupees twenty thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. H.B.T./A‑306/L Bail granted.