2001 PLP 295 (YLR)
RAJIB — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2001 PLP 295 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Wahid Bux Brohi, J |
| Parties | RAJIB — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2001 PLP 295 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2001 PLP 295 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Wahid Bux Brohi, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2001 PLP 295 (YLR) (RAJIB — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.334 337-A(i) & 337-L(ii)
Counter-cases
Fight between the parties following cattle trespass and both sustaining injuries
Which party was the aggressor could only be determined at the trial
Co- accused had been granted bail
Injury caused by the hatchet had been ascribed to the accused, but it was shown that blunt side of the hatchet had been used
Case of further inquiry having been made out in favour of the accused, he was entitled to concession of bail. Abdul Rasool Abbasi for Applicant. Ali Azhar Tunio, Asstt. A.-G. for the State
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Bail Application No.250 and Miscellaneous Application No.612 of 2001, decided on 25th June, 2001.
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.334 337-A(i) & 337-L(ii)
Counter-cases
Fight between the parties following cattle trespass and both sustaining injuries
Which party was the aggressor could only be determined at the trial
Co- accused had been granted bail
Injury caused by the hatchet had been ascribed to the accused, but it was shown that blunt side of the hatchet had been used
Case of further inquiry having been made out in favour of the accused, he was entitled to concession of bail. Abdul Rasool Abbasi for Applicant. Ali Azhar Tunio, Asstt. A.-G. for the State The applicant has prayed for bail in a case punishable for offences punishable under sections 334, 337-A(i) and 337-L(ii), P.P.C. There are counter-cases between the parties viz. Crime No.6 of 2001, the instant case and the Crime No.7 of 2001 of the same police station. It appears that there was a fight between the parties following cattle trespass. The number of injured persons in the instant case is of course larger but the complainant in I the cross case namely the present applicant Rajib has sustained injuries. Co-accused have been granted bail by this Court. Although an injury caused by hatchet has been ascribed to the present applicant, but it seems, the blunt side of the hatchet has been used. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that in view of the above it can only be determined the trial as to which party was aggressor. Mr. Tunio learned Asstt. A.-G. in the aforesaid circumstances did not oppose the bail. The above-narrated circumstances make out a case of further inquiry in favour of the applicant and as such he is entitled to bail. The applicant may be released on furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.50,000 and executing P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. H.B.T./R-40/K Bail granted.