1997SCMR1381 (PLP)
Present: Saad Saood Jan and Muhammad Ilyas, JJ AHMAD YAR and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1997SCMR1381 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Saad Saood Jan and Muhammad Ilyas, JJ AHMAD YAR and others‑‑‑Petitioners |
| Parties | Present: Saad Saood Jan and Muhammad Ilyas, JJ AHMAD YAR and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1997SCMR1381 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1997SCMR1381 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Saad Saood Jan and Muhammad Ilyas, JJ AHMAD YAR and others‑‑‑Petitioners.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1997SCMR1381 (PLP) (Present: Saad Saood Jan and Muhammad Ilyas, JJ AHMAD YAR and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M.A. Zafar, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 7th November, 1995.
- Noor Muhammad Awan, Advocate Supreme Court for the Complainant.
- S.D. Qureshi, Advocate Supreme Court for the State.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S. 497‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.337‑F(iv)/337‑A(iii)/336‑‑ Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑‑Bail‑‑‑Accused was reported to be less than sixteen years of age and his case was not covered by the prohibitory clause of S. 497(1), Cr.P.C.‑‑‑Petition for leave to appeal was converted into appeal in circumstances and the accused was admitted to bail accordingly.‑‑ [Age]. Noor Muhammad Awan, Advocate Supreme Court for the Complainant. S.D. Qureshi, Advocate Supreme Court for the State.
Judgment & Decree
M.A. Zafar, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner. Noor Muhammad Awan, Advocate Supreme Court for the Complainant. S.D. Qureshi, Advocate Supreme Court for the State. Date of hearing: 7th November, 1995. Ahmad Yar petitioner No. 1, is reported to be less than sixteen years of age. His case is not covered by the provision of prohibitory clause of section 497 of Cr.P.C. He, therefore, is admitted bail on his executing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.10,000 with two sureties in the same amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner Mianwali. This order will also cover the offence under sections 337‑F(iv), 337‑A(iii), and 336, P.P.C. This petition qua Ahmad Yar petitioner No. l is accordingly converted into appeal and allowed. As regards other petitioner no case for interference by this court is made out Dismissed. N.H.Q./A-1351/S Bail allowed.