1994SCMR2291 (PLP)
Haji AMANULLAH JAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION,
| Citation | 1994SCMR2291 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | Haji AMANULLAH JAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION, |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994SCMR2291 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994SCMR2291 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994SCMR2291 (PLP) (Haji AMANULLAH JAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION,). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M. Bilal, Senior Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Ejaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 21st November, 1993.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment, dated 27‑6‑1993, of the Peshawar High Court, Bench D.I. Khan, passed in WY No. 450/93 with CM No. 693/93). ‑‑‑‑O.I, R. 10‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185 (3)‑‑‑Petitioner's counsel did not press petition for leave to appeal and stated that he would request Trial Court for disposal of his application for impleading respondent concerned as defendant to the proceedings before proceeding further in the case‑‑‑Petition for leave to appeal stood disposed of in view of statement of the counsel.
Judgment & Decree
Civil Petition No. 351 of 1993, decided on 21st November, 1993. (On appeal from the judgment, dated 27‑6‑1993, of the Peshawar High Court, Bench D.I. Khan, passed in WY No. 450/93 with CM No. 693/93). ‑‑‑‑O.I, R. 10‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185 (3)‑‑‑Petitioner's counsel did not press petition for leave to appeal and stated that he would request Trial Court for disposal of his application for impleading respondent concerned as defendant to the proceedings before proceeding further in the case‑‑‑Petition for leave to appeal stood disposed of in view of statement of the counsel. M. Bilal, Senior Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Ejaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing: 21st November, 1993. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this petition and states that he would request the trial Court for disposal of his application for impleading respondent No. 5 (Hafiz Muhammad Rafiq) as a party to the proceedings before proceeding further in the case. In view of the statement of the learned counsel, this petition stands disposed of. A.A./A‑1124/S Order accordingly.