1986 PLP 1636 (SCMR)
SOOMAR KHAN LAHROOMAL and another — Petitioners Versus MAUDHOMAL — Respondent
| Citation | 1986 PLP 1636 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Abdul Qadir Shaikh, S.A. Nusrat and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ |
| Parties | SOOMAR KHAN LAHROOMAL and another — Petitioners Versus MAUDHOMAL — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 1636 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 1636 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Abdul Qadir Shaikh, S.A. Nusrat and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 1636 (SCMR) (SOOMAR KHAN LAHROOMAL and another — Petitioners Versus MAUDHOMAL — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M.A. Rashid, Advocate Supreme Court and A. Aziz Dastgir, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners (in both Cases).
- S.M. Abbas, Advocate-on-Record for Respondent (in both Cases).
- Date of hearing: 15th June, 1986.
- M.A. Rashid, Advocate Supreme Court and A. Aziz Dastgir, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners (in both Cases).
- S.M. Abbas, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent (in both Cases).
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgments and order of the Sind High Court, Sukkur, dated 30-1-1986 in F.R.A. Nos. 92 and 93 of 1985).
Art. 185(3)--Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S.151--Interim orders passed by High Court, in pending appeals by petitioners, in valid exercise of its discretionary jurisdiction to which no interference was called for--Leave refused.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S.151‑‑Interim orders passed by High Court, in pending appeals by petitioners, in valid exercise of its discretionary jurisdiction to which no interference was called for‑‑Leave refused. M.A. Rashid, Advocate Supreme Court and A. Aziz Dastgir, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners (in both Cases). S.M. Abbas, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent (in both Cases). Date of hearing: 15th June, 1986. ABDUL QADIR SHAIKH, J.‑‑These petitions are directed against interim orders passed by the High Court in the appeals filed by the petitioners which are pending. Since these orders have been passed in valid exercise of discretionary jurisdiction of the High Court, interference is not called for. The petitions are, therefore, dismissed. M . Y. H . Petition dismissed.