Register
PLD 1949

P (PLP)

FAQIR MUHAMMAD‑Accused‑Petitioner Versus CROWN‑Complainant‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Decided Date
Criminal Revision No 18 of 1949, decided on 16th August 1949, under section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code for revision of an order of the Sessions Judge is Baluchistan, dated 20th June 1949.
Honorable Judges
Saker, J. C.
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation P (PLP)
Forum / Court
Bench Members Saker, J. C.
Parties FAQIR MUHAMMAD‑Accused‑Petitioner Versus CROWN‑Complainant‑Respondent
Primary Law This petition has been filed against an interlocutory order dealing with a question of procedure only. While a High Court has power to interfere with the proceedings of a lower Court at any stage, that power must be used very sparingly and only when grave injustice is likely to be done.
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: This petition has been filed against an interlocutory order dealing with a question of procedure only. While a High Court has power to interfere with the proceedings of a lower Court at any stage, that power must be used very sparingly and only when grave injustice is likely to be done. as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the bench comprising: Saker, J. C..

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: P (PLP) (FAQIR MUHAMMAD‑Accused‑Petitioner Versus CROWN‑Complainant‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

This petition has been filed against an interlocutory order dealing with a question of procedure only. While a High Court has power to interfere with the proceedings of a lower Court at any stage, that power must be used very sparingly and only when grave injustice is likely to be done.

Headnotes / Summary

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 439

High Court will interfere with an interlocutory order of lower Court dealing with a question of procedure only when grave injustice is likely to be done.

Legal Tools

Metadata Directory

  • Journal: PLD
  • Volume Year: 1949
  • Citation Ref: P (PLP)

Cite & Link (Backlink Generator)

Are you writing a blog or referencing this case? Copy the optimized HTML link below to cite this judgment on your website and create a legal backlink:

HTML Backlink Code:
Text Citation:

Related Judgments

  • P HARIRAM KHIARANI, A FIRM‑Applicants Versus GOBINDRAM RATTAN CHAND, A FIRM‑Opponents
  • P MULCHAND UDHOOMAL‑Appellant Versus BHERUMAL KANOMAL and others‑Respondents
  • P MOOR MUHAMMAD, WALI MUHAMMAD‑Appellants Versus DHIRA SINGH-JAGAT SINGH and others‑Respondents
  • P RAHMATULLA‑ Plaintiff Versus MAQBOOL ALAM‑Defendant
  • P HASSOMAL-TILLUMAL‑Applicant Versus GHULAM NABI SHAH‑Respondent
  • P GHULAM MUHAMMAD KHAN Applicant Versus THE CROWN‑ Opponent