1995 PLP 650 (CLC)
COMMITTEE, LAHORE‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Agricultural,
| Citation | 1995 PLP 650 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Mian Saeed‑ur‑Rehman Farrukh, J |
| Parties | COMMITTEE, LAHORE‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Agricultural, |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1995 PLP 650 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1995 PLP 650 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Mian Saeed‑ur‑Rehman Farrukh, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1995 PLP 650 (CLC) (COMMITTEE, LAHORE‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Agricultural,). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Syed Najam‑ul‑Hassan Kazmi for Petitioner.
- Mian Najam‑uz‑Zaman, Asstt. A: G. with Muhammad Iqbal for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 30th April, 1994S
Headnotes / Summary
Constitution of Pakistan (1973)... ‑‑‑‑Art. 199‑‑‑Civil serve‑‑‑Constitutional petition‑‑‑Petitioner who was granted B.S. 17 was enjoying that status and was drawing salary accordingly, but after about four months the order‑ granting B.S. 17 was set aside by Authorities‑‑‑Such order was challenged by petitioner by filing Constitutional petition which was admitted and operation of impugned order was suspended by High Court‑‑‑During pendency of that petition, petitioner was transferred to other/place of working where he was forced to work in B.S. 15‑‑‑Petitioner had challenged such act of Authorities in the present Constitutional petition‑‑ Order of Authorities challenged in present petition, could not be treated to be an order passed in exigencies of service but it was passed so as to circumvent interim relief granted to petitioner by High Court in earlier Constitutional petition which was still pending‑‑‑Conscious effort had thus been made by Authorities to deprive petitioner of B.S. 17 in that the post to which petitioner had been ordered to be transferred, was to be filled by an officer in B.S. 15‑‑ High Court in exercise of Constitutional jurisdiction quashed illegal order passed by Authorities with cost. Lal Khan, Litigation Officer on behalf of Respondents Nos. 1 and 2.
Judgment & Decree
Lahore and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents Writ Petition No. 10050 of l993, heard on 30th April, 1994. Constitution of Pakistan (1973)... ‑‑‑‑Art. 199‑‑‑Civil serve‑‑‑Constitutional petition‑‑‑Petitioner who was granted B.S. 17 was enjoying that status and was drawing salary accordingly, but after about four months the order‑ granting B.S. 17 was set aside by Authorities‑‑‑Such order was challenged by petitioner by filing Constitutional petition which was admitted and operation of impugned order was suspended by High Court‑‑‑During pendency of that petition, petitioner was transferred to other/place of working where he was forced to work in B.S. 15‑‑‑Petitioner had challenged such act of Authorities in the present Constitutional petition‑‑ Order of Authorities challenged in present petition, could not be treated to be an order passed in exigencies of service but it was passed so as to circumvent interim relief granted to petitioner by High Court in earlier Constitutional petition which was still pending‑‑‑Conscious effort had thus been made by Authorities to deprive petitioner of B.S. 17 in that the post to which petitioner had been ordered to be transferred, was to be filled by an officer in B.S. 15‑‑ High Court in exercise of Constitutional jurisdiction quashed illegal order passed by Authorities with cost. Syed Najam‑ul‑Hassan Kazmi for Petitioner. Mian Najam‑uz‑Zaman, Asstt. A: G. with Muhammad Iqbal for Respondents. Lal Khan, Litigation Officer on behalf of Respondents Nos. 1 and