1995SCMR1148 (PLP)
Malik SABIH HUSSAIN ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1995SCMR1148 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme, Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Ajmal Mian and Muhammad Munir Khan, J |
| Parties | Malik SABIH HUSSAIN ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1995SCMR1148 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1995SCMR1148 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme, Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Ajmal Mian and Muhammad Munir Khan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1995SCMR1148 (PLP) (Malik SABIH HUSSAIN ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- S.M. Tayyab, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 14th December, 1994.
- J.V. Gardner, Advocate Supreme Court for the State.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S. 499‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑‑Prosecution had no objection if the number of sureties was increased from 1 to 4‑‑‑Petition for leave to appeal was consequently converted into appeal and accused was allowed to furnish four sureties each in the sum of Rupees 2 lacs 50 thousand instead of one surety in the terms of the order passed by High court. J.V. Gardner, Advocate Supreme Court for the State.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑‑S. 499‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑‑Prosecution had no objection if the number of sureties was increased from 1 to 4‑‑‑Petition for leave to appeal was consequently converted into appeal and accused was allowed to furnish four sureties each in the sum of Rupees 2 lacs 50 thousand instead of one surety in the terms of the order passed by High court. S.M. Tayyab, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner. J.V. Gardner, Advocate Supreme Court for the State. Date of hearing: 14th December, 1994. AJMAL MIAN, J.‑‑‑This is a petition for leave to appeal against the order dated 28‑9‑1994 passed by the learned Single Judge of Lahore High Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1003/M of 1994 filed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3110‑B of 1994 for reduction of number of bail or increasing the member of sureties, but the request has been declined by the learned Single Judge in Chamber. Mr. J.V. Gardner, learned counsel for the State is present and submits that State will have no objection if, the number of sureties is increased from 1 to
4. This petition is converted into appeal and allowed. The petitioner can furnish 4 sureties each in the sum of Rs.2 lacs 50 thousand, instead of one surety, in the terms of the order passed by the High Court. N.H.Q./S‑939/S Petition dismissed.