2004 P Cr (PLP)
MUHARRAM‑‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 2004 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Moosa K. Leghari and Khilji Arif Hussain, JJ |
| Parties | MUHARRAM‑‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2004 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2004 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Muhammad Moosa K. Leghari and Khilji Arif Hussain, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2004 P Cr (PLP) (MUHARRAM‑‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S. 497‑‑‑Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), S.9(a)‑‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑‑Accused was arrested from near a shrine on having been found in possession of 95 grams of "Charas"‑‑‑No private person was associated to witness the recovery‑‑‑Enmity with the Excise police officials was alleged by the accused‑‑‑Offence being punishable with two years' R.I., case was pending before the Magistrate‑‑‑Accused was behind the bars for the last more than four months‑‑‑Bail was granted to accused in circumstances. Khadim Hussain Solangi for Applicant. Rasheed Ahmed Qureshi, Asstt. A.‑G. for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Khadim Hussain Solangi for Applicant. Rasheed Ahmed Qureshi, Asstt. A.‑G. for the State. The applicant was found in possession of 95 grams of Charas as per the contents of F.I.R. Crime No.3 of 2003 registered by Excise Police, Dadu under section 9(a), C.N.S. Act. Learned A.A.‑G. requested for time to collect the police papers. However, we find the relevant documents are available in the bail application. Thus, the bail application was heard with the assistance of learned A.A.‑G. He has opposed the bail. The applicant was arrested on 8‑10‑2003 at 4‑00 p.m. near the shrine of Bodla Bahar. Yet no private person was associated to witness the recovery. Enmity with the officials of Excise Police is alleged by the applicant. The case is pending before the Magistrate as the offence is punishable by two years. The applicant is behind the bars since morel than last four months. In the circumstances, the applicant is granted bail in the sum of Rs.50,000 and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. N.H.Q./M‑26/K Bail granted.