PCRLJ 1981

1981 P Cr (PLP)

Malik MUHAMMAD SHARIF — Petitioner Versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, ETC.-Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Writ Petition No. 10402 of 1980, decided on 8th December, 1980.
Honorable Judges
Rustam S. Sidhwa, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1981 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Rustam S. Sidhwa, J
Parties Malik MUHAMMAD SHARIF — Petitioner Versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, ETC.-Respondents
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Rustam S. Sidhwa, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 P Cr (PLP) (Malik MUHAMMAD SHARIF — Petitioner Versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, ETC.-Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)

Representation

  • Syed Kamal Mufti for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

Art. 199 and Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 154

Writ jurisdiction invoked by petitioner for recording F. I. R. against Police Officers

Offences cognizable

Respondent Station House Officer agreeing to register F. I. R. on basis of statement submitted by petitioner and signed by former--Petition disposed off accordingly with direction to Superintendent of Police to act under S. 551, Cr. P. C. anal depute a Police Officer to investigate case,--[First Information Report]. Respondent No. 2 in person. Respondent No. 3 in person.

Judgment & Decree

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)

Art. 199 and Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 154

Writ jurisdiction invoked by petitioner for recording F. I. R. against Police Officers

Offences cognizable

Respondent Station House Officer agreeing to register F. I. R. on basis of statement submitted by petitioner and signed by former--Petition disposed off accordingly with direction to Superintendent of Police to act under S. 551, Cr. P. C. anal depute a Police Officer to investigate case,--[First Information Report]. Syed Kamal Mufti for Petitioner. Respondent No. 2 in person. Respondent No. 3 in person. Argument heard the feats disclosed is this petition make out cogizable offences. The petitioner bas submitted kris statement in writing to respondent No, 2 for the registration of the F. I. R which respondent No, 2 has agreed to register. Copy of the staid statement, duly signed by respondent No. 2, its placed on the record.

2. With this observation, this petition stands disposed of. Since the allegations in the statement disclose offences committed by Police, Officers, the Superintendent of Police (City). Lahore, is hereby directed to net under section 551, Cr, P. C, and to depute a Police Officer not below the rank of Inspector of Police to investigate the case, Order accordingly.