CLC 1981

1981 PLP 52 (CLC)

Mst. JANAT BIBI‑Appellant Versus ABDUL KARIM‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
‑‑ S. 11 ‑Res judicata‑Prior suits between parties involving subject matter of present suit directly and substantially and matter decided finally‑Present suit, held, barred by doctrine of res judicata.‑Res judicata.
Decided Date
Civil Appeal No. 26 of 1980, decided on 30th September 1980.
Honorable Judges
Sardar Muhammad Sharif Khan, Actg. C. J. and Sardar Said Muhammad Khan, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1981 PLP 52 (CLC)
Forum / Court ‑‑ S. 11 ‑Res judicata‑Prior suits between parties involving subject matter of present suit directly and substantially and matter decided finally‑Present suit, held, barred by doctrine of res judicata.‑Res judicata.
Bench Members Sardar Muhammad Sharif Khan, Actg. C. J. and Sardar Said Muhammad Khan, J
Parties Mst. JANAT BIBI‑Appellant Versus ABDUL KARIM‑Respondent
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 52 (CLC)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 52 (CLC)?

The case was heard and decided by the ‑‑ S. 11 ‑Res judicata‑Prior suits between parties involving subject matter of present suit directly and substantially and matter decided finally‑Present suit, held, barred by doctrine of res judicata.‑Res judicata. bench comprising: Sardar Muhammad Sharif Khan, Actg. C. J. and Sardar Said Muhammad Khan, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 52 (CLC) (Mst. JANAT BIBI‑Appellant Versus ABDUL KARIM‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • M. Y. Surakhvi for Appellant.
  • Abdul Karim with M. S. Tariq for Respondent.

Headnotes / Summary

(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑ ‑‑ S. 11 ‑Res judicata‑Prior suits between parties involving subject matter of present suit directly and substantially and matter decided finally‑Present suit, held, barred by doctrine of res judicata.‑[Res judicata]. (b) Limitation Act (IX of 1908)‑ ‑‑ Art. 49‑LimitationCause of action arising long before institution of previous suit‑Appellant in previous suit asserting to have been deprived of her dowry by respondent long before institution of such suitSuit filed after a lapse of three years, held, time‑barred under Art. 49 of Limitation Act, in circumstances.‑[Limitation]. Dates of institution : 11th August 1980.

Judgment & Decree

(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑ ‑‑ S. 11 ‑Res judicata‑Prior suits between parties involving subject matter of present suit directly and substantially and matter decided finally‑Present suit, held, barred by doctrine of res judicata.‑[Res judicata]. (b) Limitation Act (IX of 1908)‑ ‑‑ Art. 49‑LimitationCause of action arising long before institution of previous suit‑Appellant in previous suit asserting to have been deprived of her dowry by respondent long before institution of such suitSuit filed after a lapse of three years, held, time‑barred under Art. 49 of Limitation Act, in circumstances.‑[Limitation]. M. Y. Surakhvi for Appellant. Abdul Karim with M. S. Tariq for Respondent. Dates of institution : 11th August 1980.