SCMR 1991

1991 PLP 1909 (SCMR)

PERVAIZ AKHTAR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Miscellaneous Petition Nos.67 of 1989 and Petition No. 328 of 1989, decided on 29th November, 1989.
Honorable Judges
Ghulam Mujaddid, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1991 PLP 1909 (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Ghulam Mujaddid, J
Parties PERVAIZ AKHTAR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1991 PLP 1909 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1991 PLP 1909 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Ghulam Mujaddid, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1991 PLP 1909 (SCMR) (PERVAIZ AKHTAR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Miss Gulshan Ara, Senior Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
  • Maqbool Elahi Malik, Advocate-General Punjab for Respondent.
  • Maqbool Elahi Malik, Advocate‑General Punjab for Respondent.
  • Advocate‑General, Punjab, is present in some other case. He accepts notice in this case as well.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 426

Bail, grant of

Accused had already been taken into custody and sentence awarded to him was short

Accused was admitted to bail.

Judgment & Decree

‑‑‑‑S. 426‑‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑‑Accused had already been taken into custody and sentence awarded to him was short‑‑‑Accused was admitted to bail. Miss Gulshan Ara, Senior Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner. Maqbool Elahi Malik, Advocate‑General Punjab for Respondent. Advocate‑General, Punjab, is present in some other case. He accepts notice in this case as well. I am told that the petitioner has already been taken into custody. The sentence is short. Petitioner is admitted to bail subject to his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.10,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, till the petition is finally disposed of. H.B.T./P‑121/S Bail granted.