2006 P Cr (PLP)
AHMED SULTAN and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2006 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | AHMED SULTAN and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 P Cr (PLP) (AHMED SULTAN and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- 3. learned Advocate for the applicants has not pressed the bail application in respect of applicant Ahmed Sultan, at this stage, therefore, the application is dismissed as not pressed in respect of above named applicant.
- The allegation against the applicant Hadi Bux is that he escaped from the custody of the police. Learned Advocate for the applicants has stated that the offence if any would fall under section 225-B, P.P.C. which is bailable therefore, applicant is entitled for the concession of bail.
- Learned Assistant Advocate-General has conceded the above position and has no objection to the grant of bail in view of the above position.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.324, 353, 225-B, 427, 148 & 149
Bail application had not been pressed by counsel of accused persons in respect of one accused
Bail application to the extent of said accused was dismissed as not pressed
Allegation against the other accused was that he escaped from the custody of police
Said offence, if any, against accused, would fall under S.225-B, P.P.C. which was bailable
Said accused was entitled for concession of bail--State Counsel had conceded the position and had no objection to grant of bail to accused
Judgment & Decree
RAHMAT HUSSAIN JAFFERI, J.
Granted.
2. Granted subject to all just legal exceptions. 3. learned Advocate for the applicants has not pressed the bail application in respect of applicant Ahmed Sultan, at this stage, therefore, the application is dismissed as not pressed in respect of above named applicant. The allegation against the applicant Hadi Bux is that he escaped from the custody of the police. Learned Advocate for the applicants has stated that the offence if any would fall under section 225-B, P.P.C. which is bailable therefore, applicant is entitled for the concession of bail. Learned Assistant Advocate-General has conceded the above position and has no objection to the grant of bail in view of the above position. Accordingly, bail is granted to the applicant Hadi Bux in the sum of R.50,000 on furnishing solvent surety with P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court. The application is partly allowed and partly dismissed. H.B.T./A-77/K??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Bail granted.