PCRLJ 1985

1985 P Cr (PLP)

ALLAH YAR‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3352‑B of 1984, decided on 15th December, 1984.
Honorable Judges
Ijaz Nisar, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1985 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Ijaz Nisar, J
Parties ALLAH YAR‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1985 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1985 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Ijaz Nisar, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1985 P Cr (PLP) (ALLAH YAR‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

Representation

  • M. Anwar Sipra for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑

S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 323‑‑Bail‑‑Accused alleged to have given simple injuries to complainant‑‑Investigation of case being over and person of accused no longer required by police‑‑Bail granted in circumstances. Sh. Naseer Uddin for the State.

Judgment & Decree

‑‑‑

S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 323‑‑Bail‑‑Accused alleged to have given simple injuries to complainant‑‑Investigation of case being over and person of accused no longer required by police‑‑Bail granted in circumstances. M. Anwar Sipra for Petitioner. Sh. Naseer Uddin for the State. The petitioner alongwith 6 others stands charged for committing house trespass and for murderously assaulting Hanif Shah, Irshad Shah, Riaz Shah and Mst. Afsar Bibi P.Ws. on 1‑7‑1984 with a Sots, and hatchet over the dispute of a Ihata and tube‑well. 2. Bail is urged on the ground that the petitioner is alleged to have given simple injuries to Hanif Shah P.W. with a Sota and further that he had nothing to do with the afore‑mentioned dispute because lie is not at all connected with any party. He has referred to precedent cages where bail to an accused not alleged to have caused any grievous injury was granted. It is further stated that following the completion of investigation the challan has been put in Court. 3. As the investigation is over and the person of the petitioner is no longer required by the police, I admit him to bail in the sum Of IA Rs.15,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Magistrate. A.A. Bail granted.