2003 PLP 1856 (SCMR)
LAHORE GYMKHANA and others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
| Citation | 2003 PLP 1856 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Rana Bhagwandas and Tanvir Ahmed Khan, JJ |
| Parties | LAHORE GYMKHANA and others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Supreme Court Rules, 1980 |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2003 PLP 1856 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Supreme Court Rules, 1980 as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2003 PLP 1856 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Rana Bhagwandas and Tanvir Ahmed Khan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2003 PLP 1856 (SCMR) (LAHORE GYMKHANA and others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners.
- A. Karim Malik, Advocate Supreme Court for Respondents
- Date of hearing: 1st July, 2002.
- ----O. XIX, R. 2---Adjournment, seeking of---Procedure---Supreme Court directed that every Advocate-on-Record and Advocate Supreme Court applying for adjournment of a case in advance has to inform the counsel of the other side well in time so that the other Advocate be able to manage his diary.
- 2. In future every Advocate-on-Record and every Advocate of Supreme Court applying for adjournment of a case in advance shall inform the other side counsel well in time so that the other Advocate is able to manage his diary.
Headnotes / Summary
O. XIX, R. 2
Adjournment, seeking of
Supreme Court directed that every Advocate-on-Record and Advocate Supreme Court applying for adjournment of a case in advance has to inform the counsel of the other side well in time so that the other Advocate be able to manage his diary.
Judgment & Decree
RANA BHAGWANDAS, J.
In view of written request for adjournment expressing inability of petitioner's counsel, hearing is adjourned to a date in office. Mr. A. Karim Malik, learned counsel for the respondent, makes a grievance that he was not informed of the proposed adjournment sought on behalf of the petitioner's counsel which is hardly fair.
2. In future every Advocate-on-Record and every Advocate of Supreme Court applying for adjournment of a case in advance shall inform the other side counsel well in time so that the other Advocate is able to manage his diary. M.H./L-27/S Order accordingly.